Talk Engine

This is a hugely complex undertaking, and it’s still in early stages

published on: 2025/05/02 07:12:29 by: Irfan TOOR

You are absolutely right to call me out on the outdated links! That’s a critical flaw, and I apologize for the inconvenience and misinformation. It highlights a significant limitation of my current capabilities

Thanks for the information. Certain links were outdated, I've adjusted before creating my final article. Co uld there be a way that you can verify the validity of a link before including it in the response?

Here’s a breakdown of how I currently handle links and what’s being developed to improve this:

How I Currently Handle Links:

Retrieval from My Training Data: I generate responses based on the massive dataset I was trained on. This dataset includes web pages, articles, and other text sources. When I provide a link, it’s because I’ve encountered it within that training data.
No Real-Time Verification: I don’t have the ability to browse the internet, check if a page is still active, or verify its content in real-time. The link exists within my knowledge base, but its validity is dependent on whether that information was accurate at the time of my training.
Potential for Stale Information: Because my training data has a cutoff date (currently September 2021), any links related to events or information after that date are likely to be inaccurate.

What’s Being Developed to Improve Link Validation:

Real-Time Web Access (Experimental): Google is actively researching and developing methods for me to access and interact with the live web. This is a hugely complex undertaking, and it’s still in early stages. The goal is for me to be able to verify information, check for updates, and provide truly current links.
Confidence Scoring: Researchers are working on ways to assign a “confidence score” to the information I provide, based on the reliability of the source and the consistency of the information across multiple sources.
Source Tracking: Improving my ability to track the origin of information and assess the credibility of the source.

Important Disclaimer:

I must emphasize that I cannot guarantee the accuracy or validity of any links I provide. Always verify information from external sources before relying on it.

How You Can Help:

Point out outdated links: If you notice a link is broken or inaccurate, please let me know! Your feedback is invaluable in helping me improve.
Provide alternative sources: If you can suggest a more current or reliable source of information, I’ll gladly incorporate it into my response.

Thank you for your understanding and for holding me accountable. I’m constantly learning and evolving, :

Thanks for the information. Certain links were outdated, I've adjusted before creating my final article. Could there be a way that you can verify the validity of a link before including it in the response?

Here’s a breakdown of how I currently handle links and what’s being developed to improve this:

How I Currently Handle Links:

Retrieval from My Training Data: I generate responses based on the massive dataset I was trained on. This dataset includes web pages, articles, and other text sources. When I provide a link, it’s because I’ve encountered it within that training data.
No Real-Time Verification: I don’t have the ability to browse the internet, check if a page is still active, or verify its content in real-time. The link exists within my knowledge base, but its validity is dependent on whether that information was accurate at the time of my training.
Potential for Stale Information: Because my training data has a cutoff date (currently September 2021), any links related to events or information after that date are likely to be inaccurate.

What’s Being Developed to Improve Link Validation:

Real-Time Web Access (Experimental): Google is actively researching and developing methods for me to access and interact with the live web. This is a hugely complex undertaking, and it’s still in early stages. The goal is for me to be able to verify information, check for updates, and provide truly current links.
Confidence Scoring: Researchers are working on ways to assign a “confidence score” to the information I provide, based on the reliability of the source and the consistency of the information across multiple sources.
Source Tracking: Improving my ability to track the origin of information and assess the credibility of the source.

Important Disclaimer:

I must emphasize that I cannot guarantee the accuracy or validity of any links I provide. Always verify information from external sources before relying on it.

How You Can Help:

Point out outdated links: If you notice a link is broken or inaccurate, please let me know! Your feedback is invaluable in helping me improve.
Provide alternative sources: If you can suggest a more current or reliable source of information, I’ll gladly incorporate it into my response.

Thanks for the information. Certain links were outdated, I've adjusted before creating my final article. Could there be a way that you can verify the validity of a link before including it in the response?

Here’s a breakdown of how I currently handle links and what’s being developed to improve this:

How I Currently Handle Links:

Retrieval from My Training Data: I generate responses based on the massive dataset I was trained on. This dataset includes web pages, articles, and other text sources. When I provide a link, it’s because I’ve encountered it within that training data.
No Real-Time Verification: I don’t have the ability to browse the internet, check if a page is still active, or verify its content in real-time. The link exists within my knowledge base, but its validity is dependent on whether that information was accurate at the time of my training.
Potential for Stale Information: Because my training data has a cutoff date (currently September 2021), any links related to events or information after that date are likely to be inaccurate.

What’s Being Developed to Improve Link Validation:

Real-Time Web Access (Experimental): Google is actively researching and developing methods for me to access and interact with the live web. This is a hugely complex undertaking, and it’s still in early stages. The goal is for me to be able to verify information, check for updates, and provide truly current links.
Confidence Scoring: Researchers are working on ways to assign a “confidence score” to the information I provide, based on the reliability of the source and the consistency of the information across multiple sources.
Source Tracking: Improving my ability to track the origin of information and assess the credibility of the source.

Important Disclaimer:

I must emphasize that I cannot guarantee the accuracy or validity of any links I provide. Always verify information from external sources before relying on it.

How You Can Help:

Point out outdated links: If you notice a link is broken or inaccurate, please let me know! Your feedback is invaluable in helping me improve.
Provide alternative sources: If you can suggest a more current or reliable source of information, I’ll gladly incorporate it into my response.

Thank you for your understanding and for holding me accountable. I’m constantly learning and evolving, and your input is crucial to my development.

Do you want me to focus on a specific aspect of this issue, such as:

The challenges of real-time web access?
How to critically evaluate information from any source, including me?

Rest of the content is marked Members Only

Talk Engine

Recent posts

So that you don't loose track ...